The article was (I suspect that they'll change it some time or another) kicked off with a photograph of a young baboon. The photograph was captioned "common marmoset." I wrote to them and pointed out the error and suggested that they might want to change it. I recommended a photo of a rhesus macaque since rhesus monkeys are the most commonly consumed species at the NIH National Primate Research Centers. Here's my email correspondence with them:
The mislabeled image is of a young baboon, a species not usually used at the New England primate center. Thought you'd want to know.
(What else don't the editors really understand about the experimental use of nonhuman primates?)Someone named John S. Rosenberg wrote back right away and said:
If so, and we will research, the image is wrongly labeled from the photo source from which we acquired the image. JSRTo which, I replied:
just stick common marmoset into Google images for comparison,
do the same for young baboon
The most accurate image would be of a rhesus macaque, the overwhelmingly most common primate species used at the primate centers including New England.It's not a giant deal of course, but I can't help laughing when I see the image and caption still being used by these experts:
And a little larger for clarity: