UW-Madison College of Letters and Science "Macaque Enrichment" Doc.

Of the 4 documents I recieved form the university on May 10, 2021, after 142 days of waiting, the College of Letters and Science was, in a way, the oddest.

These redactions are odd and questionable. The use of macaques at the School of Letters and Science generally takes place at the Harlow lab, just across an alley form the Primate Center. Why redact that location? Maybe if crazy animal rights fanatics learned that monkeys are being experimented on in the building that used to house and is named after Harry Harlow, they would go crazy? Who doesn't know that the Harlow lab experiments on monkeys? And why is the title of something staff are required to read hidden? Strange indeed. Or just silly and/or dumb.

It's doubly weird and silly because anyone can google "Harlow lab" and immediately see a picture of it and the address and phone number. And if you go to their webpage, you see immediately that the Director is (still) Chris Coe.

Whatever, here's the document:
UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON
COLLEGE OF LETTERS AND SCIENCE
STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES
SOP #325 DATE ISSUED: April 13, 2018
TITLE: Macaque Enrichment

There is no mention of what to do when a monkey starts exhibiting signs of mental illness. Maybe that's in yet another document. We'll see.

Primate Environmental Enrichment at UW-Madison - The Plan

The image above is from the University of Wisconsin, Madison's Primate Research Center's Animal Services webpage. (The splash images rotate periodically.) I think it more fair to point to this image rather than a generic image from another source.

The Animal Welfare Act (Public Law 89-544) was passed in 1966. For the most part, laboratories using animals continued their business as usual. Exercise requirements for dogs and psychological well-being for primates were not mandated until 1985. The law requires laboratories using primates to have a plan that provides an environment that promotes their psychological well-being. This plan musy be available to USDA inspectors on request. It took the University of Wisconsin, Madison 142 days provide me with this copy of their legally required plan. Oddly, the plan is dated 2020. Did they have to write it because I requested it? It woundn't surprise me.

The introduction captures the essence of the plan:

The Environmental Enhancement Program at the Wisconsin National Primate Research Center (WNPRC) is dedicated to promoting and enhancing psychological well-being for the entire non-human primate (NHP)colony while ensuring that our animals are free from unnecessary pain and distress. By utilizing a combination of environmental enrichment, behavior modification, and positive reinforcement, the program attempts to promote a diverse array of species typical behaviors and decrease the occurrence of stereotypical and self-injurious behavior (SIB) by increasing activity.

Tellingly, the plan merely attempts to decrease the incidence of profound psychological distress. There is nothing in the Animal Welfare Act that mandates success. Everyone who takes the time to learn about the issue knows that it is next to impossible to maintain the psychological well-being of macaques kept for years in small steel cages.

There is nothing in the law that says the plan must be successful.

The Animal Wefare Act does though stipulate who must have sufficient and appropriate authority to assure that adequate veterinary care is provided at all times and that he or she is able to oversee the adequacy of all aspects of animal care and use for all animals. That person must be the attending veterinarian. The attending veterinarian at the UW-Madison is Saverio “Buddy” Capuano.

I doubt his situation is unique, though I've not looked closely at the publishing histories of attending vets at the other large primate labs aroung the country. In Capuano's case, he is a coauthor of numerous papers detailing a host of terible things done to monkeys that he has had a hand in.

So it can't come as too much of a surprise that monkeys at the university are caged alone for years on end, that there are monkeys pulling their hair out, pacing endlessly, whose lives are pretty much a living hell.

Look at the picture at the top of this essay. It must be an example of what the university, Capuano, et al consider an example of good care. But these young monkeys are in a box and will be for their entire lives. Compare their likely life experiences with those of wild rhesus macaques.

In any case, here's one more document I received in response to my request: cage size exemptions.

Environmental Enrichment at UW Madison - pair housing macaques

Just about a month ago, I suggested that the University of Wisconsin might be in violation of the Animal Welfare Act because they had been dragging their feet for so long in providing me with copies of documents that they are required to have on hand and ready to be reviewed by a UDSA Animal Welfare inspector.

I wrote to the state Attorney General's Office about the length of time I had been waiting -- The AG's office says on its website that though there is no specified time requirement in the law, that two weeks is a reasonable amount of time. Within a few days I received the documents that I had been waiting 142 days for. The cover letter was undated; the records were made available to me on May 10, 2021 (see below). I asked for them on December 19, 2020.

Of the four documents I received, the pair housing exemption list provides the most insight into the living conditions of monkeys at the university. The NIH Office of Laboratory Animal Welfare booklet "Macaques," a part of it's series Enrichment for NonHuman Primates, says:

Because of the intrinsic social nature of macaques, pair or group housing of compatible animals is extremely important. It is well-known that raising a macaque alone, without the company of other macaques of the same species, will result in that animal expressing a pattern of abnormal behaviors that can become self-destructive. Even the behavior profiles of adult animals housed alone can degenerate into inciting these abnormal behaviors, which may include repeated pacing, circling, or somersaulting; hyper-aggression; depression; and self-injurious behavior, including hair plucking or self-biting.

Everyone even a tiny bit interested and even minimally informed seems to know that keeping macaques in cages by themselves is harmful to them. The effects seems to be significantly worse than keeping humans in solitary confinement. And yet, if I am reading the document correctly (there is no one to ask), on or about the day the document was printed, 67 macaques were in cages by themselves.

One female monkey, rh2347, was apparently moved to a cage with another monkey on February 25, 2021, afer 12 years of being alone.

Three monkeys have been cages alone since 2013. Six since 2014. Eleven since 2015.

The Wisconsin National Primate Research is a hideous place, all the monkey labs are. They all operate in pretty much the same way.

View Message

CC: lisa.hull@wisc.edu;
Subject: Rick Bogle Public Records Request :: P001468-121920
Body:
RE: PUBLIC RECORDS REQUEST of December 19, 2020.
Reference # P001468-121920.

Dear Requester:

I write in response to your request under the Wisconsin Public Records Law, Wisconsin Statutes §§19.31-19.39, dated December 19, 2020 for, “the university's primate psychological enhancement plan or (plans) and any exemptions that have been granted from January 1, 2020 to present. (For reference see 9 CFR § 3.81).”

Attached please find 33-pages of records in response to your request.

We have redacted or withheld the following categories of information for the reasons given below:

[blah, blah, blah...]

Sincerely,
Lynn Rusch
Senior Administrative Program Specialist
University of Wisconsin – Madison

UW-Madison May Be in Frank Violation the Animal Welfare Act

Using their public records request on-line portal, I submitted a public records request to the University of Wisconsin, Madison on December 19, 2020.

Please send me a copy (or copies) of the university's primate psychological enhancement plan (or plans) and any exemptions that have been granted from January 1, 2020 to present. (For reference see 9 CFR § 3.81).

Thanks in advance,

Rick Bogle

Almost 5 months later, I’m still waiting.

9 CFR § 3.81:

§ 3.81 Environment enhancement to promote psychological well-being.

Dealers, exhibitors, and research facilities must develop, document, and follow an appropriate plan for environment enhancement adequate to promote the psychological well-being of nonhuman primates. The plan must be in accordance with the currently accepted professional standards as cited in appropriate professional journals or reference guides, and as directed by the attending veterinarian. This plan must be made available to APHIS upon request, and, in the case of research facilities, to officials of any pertinent funding agency.

If the plan must be made available to APHIS upon request, it seems that the plan must be readily available. (APHIS, the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, is a small branch of the USDA. APHIS is charged with oversight of compliance with the Animal Welfare Act, of which § 3.81 is a part.)

Why hasn’t the university sent me a copy of their primate psychological enhancement plan or plans?

The University of Wisconsin is odd in a number of ways, but particularly so with regard to the use of monkeys. Numerous vivisectors across campus use these animals. Maybe the School of Medicine and Public Health, where the infamous Michele Basso experimented on monkeys, has its own plan. Maybe the infamous Harlow Center for Biological Psychology (aka, the Harlow Lab) has its own plan. And maybe the University of Wisconsin National Primate Research Center, just across the street from the Harlow lab, has its own plan. Who knows? Maybe they don’t have a plan? Maybe they are writing one right now?

In any case, a four month-long delay in sending me a document that they are legally required to have on-hand doesn’t instill a lot of confidence. It suggests to me that they are breaking the law by not having a plan, can’t find it (which means that no one ever looks at it), or are afraid I will read it and write about it, or.... Honestly, I can’t come up with another scenario to explain their delay.

"Good Animal Care and Good Science Go Hand in Hand"

If good animal care and good science go hand in hand, it follows that poor animal care results in poor science.

The most appropriate behavioral management program houses macaques in a sufficiently enriched and safe environment to prevent the development of abnormal behaviors.

Abnormal behaviors include repetitive movements, such as pacing, circling, rocking, spinning, somersaulting and bouncing. Cage-licking, self-clasping, self-sucking, masturbation, “saluting,” and eating feces are some other aberrant, repetitive behaviors. Abnormal behaviors in macaques also can hurt or injure the animals, as in the case of hair plucking, self-biting and head banging.

Abnormal behaviors are an undesirable consequence of captive housing, reflecting an inadequate environment for maintaining the animal.” Macaques Kathryn Bayne, M.S., Ph.D., D.V.M., DACLAM, CAAB AAALAC International. (NIH Publication No. 05-5744).

The only conclusion that can be drawn from the undercover investigations and whistle-blower reports documenting a variety of serious behavioral problems like self-wounding, pulling out their hair, repetitive movements, and chronic diarrhea afflicting monkeys at the Wisconsin National Primate Research Center is that the "science" being conducted there is not good science.

From Peta's 2020 undercover investigation at UW-Madison Keeping a monkey alone in such a bleak environment is obviously very cruel. It should be illegal.

This begs the questions of why does NIH continue to fund poor science? Why are the university's Animal Care and Use Committees consistently approving the resulting poor scientific projects? Why haven't USDA-APHIS inspectors cited the primate labs for their poor care? Why hasn't NIH OLAW required the reporting of behavioral problems and chronic diarrhea?

Unfortunately, the answer is the same for all of these questions. No one really cares. All the claims about good science being dependent on good animal care are just propaganda. Everyone on the inside must know this, which makes all of them liars.

And, of course, the reason no one cares is that there is no reason to. The money keeps pouring in.

Never-Ending Suffering at UW-Madison

Six months undercover.

Flat Indignant Denial

I came accoss this phrase in Nicholson Baker's book Baseless: My Search for Secrets in the Ruins of the Freedom of Information Act. (Penguin Press, 2020). It was the strategy used by the CIA in its claims that it had not engaged in bio-warfare.

I was struck by how aptly the phrase captures universities' statements whenever details of their use of animals make it into the news cycle.

A Tiny Sliver of What UW-Madison Doesn't Want You to Know

A PETA Undercover Investigation

Workers Pry Baby Monkeys Away From Their Mothers, Electroshock Penises, and More in Deranged Lab

Parkinson's Breakthrough or Plain Old Hype?

You be the judge.

I'd have commented on UW-Madison's Facebook page, but I'm blocked. They are seemingly afraid of substantive dialog. And really, who can blame them? Million's of tax-payer dollars are at stake.

They recently linked to a press release from the university's PR department about purported progress in treating Parkinson's disease.

Primate Center vivisector Maria Emborg has published a paper reporting on her use of stem cells injected into the brains of monkeys who have some symptoms that mimic Parkinson's symptoms in humans.

The reason they have these symptoms is that she had injected a chemical called MPTP into their brains. [If you are interested, here are a handfull of posts concerning this hideousness.]

Now, you'd think from the press release that this was important big news. It isn't, and I'll get to that in a second. What's particularly hideous is what MPTP injected in their brains does to the monkeys. Reasonable people agree that this is just about as terrible a thing as you can do to an animal.

The reason this isn't big news, and what isn't mentioned in the press release, is that very similar research on fully consenting humans has been underway since at least the early 1990s. See Li, Wen, et al. ["Extensive graft-derived dopaminergic innervation is maintained 24 years after transplantation in the degenerating parkinsonian brain." Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 113.23 (2016): 6544-6549.]

Research using fully consenting humans is the only ethical way to proceed, and probably the smartest.

A bit of trivia: Check out her public funding history.

UW-Madison refuses own medicine....

Long-time observers will not be surprised that a letter which appeared in the Mar 11, 2021, Capital Times pointing to the gross discrepency between a UW-Madison National Primate Research Center factsheet on pet monkeys and the Primate Center's own practices led to the university deleting the factsheet almost immediately and replacing it with a less embarrassing substitute. Ryan Hartkopf: UW-Madison, are you sure you want a monkey?

I guess they embrace the 'do as I say, not as I do' philosophy.

See the archived fact sheet here (you have to scroll down), and the gutted version without mention of the minimumly humane cage size here.

The cage-size standard in labs using monkeys must meet the minimum cage sizes stipulated in the Animal Welfare Act. Subpart D: Specifications for the Humane Handling, Care, Treatment, and Transportation of Nonhuman Primates stipulates that cages for young and female macaques must have at least 4.3 sq. ft. of floor space and be at least 30" high. Adult male macaques must have 6 sq.ft. of floor space and be at least 32" high. In the deleted Fact Sheet, the university says, "The minimum cage size for the smallest monkey is 4ft x 6ft x 6ft. That's 24 square feet of floor space, almost four times the floor space and two and a half times taller than is required by the Animal Wefare Act.

This is the reality of the housing used by the primate labs:

Kudos to letter writer Ryan Hartkopf for taking the time to read and think about what the university says it does and what it actually does to to animals. And kudos likewise to the Captital Times for publicing his letter.